The Complete Guide to Economic Order Quantity
Every time you reorder stock you face a hidden tug of war. Order in big batches and you save on freight and paperwork, but you pay more to warehouse the extra inventory. Order in small batches and your storage costs drop, but your freight and admin costs climb because you are ordering constantly. The Economic Order Quantity is the mathematically proven order size that sits exactly at the bottom of that trade-off, where your total annual cost is as low as it can possibly go.
The EOQ formula
The model was first published by Ford Whitman Harris in 1913 and is still the foundation of modern inventory management. It works out the order size where total ordering cost and total holding cost cross over and balance.
Annual Holding Cost per Unit (H) = Cost per Unit x (Holding Cost Percentage / 100)EOQ = square root of ( (2 x Annual Demand x Cost per Order) / H )
Because you cannot physically order a fraction of a product, this calculator rounds the EOQ up to the next whole unit. From there it derives the rest of your supply chain picture: expected orders per year, total ordering cost, total holding cost, and the combined total annual inventory cost.
How to use this calculator
Enter your Annual Demand in units, your Cost per Order (the fixed cost of placing one order, such as flat-rate freight), your Cost per Unit, and your Annual Holding Cost Percentage. Results update instantly with no submit button. The big number on the left is the exact quantity to order each time. The number beside it tells you how many of those orders you should place over the year.
Why ordering cost and holding cost are equal at the EOQ
This is the heart of the model and the easiest way to confirm the math is working. As your order size grows, ordering cost falls and holding cost rises. The total cost curve bottoms out precisely where those two lines intersect, which is the point where total annual ordering cost equals total annual holding cost. In the receipt above you will notice the two cost columns land at almost the same value. That near-equality is the visual signature of a correct EOQ, and it is why the optimal answer feels balanced rather than lopsided.
What the holding cost percentage really covers
Many businesses underestimate this figure. A realistic annual holding cost percentage rolls together warehouse rent and utilities, insurance on the stored goods, shrinkage from theft or damage, spoilage and obsolescence, and the opportunity cost of capital locked up in inventory instead of earning a return elsewhere. For shelf-stable, low-value goods it may sit near 15 percent. For refrigerated, fragile, or fast-obsolescing products such as electronics and fashion it can climb well past 25 percent.
Knowing the limits of the model
EOQ assumes steady demand, a fixed cost per order, a fixed holding rate, instant replenishment, and no bulk discounts. Real supply chains bend those rules. If a supplier offers a price break for ordering a larger quantity, the cheaper unit cost can outweigh the extra holding cost, so you should compare the EOQ result against the discounted scenario. Treat the EOQ as a strong, defensible baseline, then layer in safety stock for demand swings and lead time variability.